You successfully added to your cart! You can either continue shopping, or checkout now if you'd like.
Note: If you'd like to continue shopping, you can always access your cart from the icon at the upper-right of every page.
Here is what Hillary Clinton thinks about the US funding of the rebels in Syria. Zionists will love Hillary for this, as her strategy is to “help Israel deal with Iran’s growing nuclear capability” by overthrowing Assad. It seems that Syria was targeted mainly because of its alliance with Iran and had little or nothing to do with Assad’s lack of democratic ideals.
“Bringing down Assad would not only be a massive boon to Israel’s security, it would also ease Israel’s understandable fear of losing its nuclear monopoly.”
So Israel has a “nuclear monopoly,” she says. That, of course, is one of the worst-kept secrets in world history, though the Israeli state itself refuses to confirm this.
The question remains: What legal right does the USA have to undermine or overthrow the leaders of other nations? What if other countries tried to effect “regime change” in America? Does might make right? Is the US always (or ever) right to impose its will on other nations?
It seems that the US government is as unsuccessful at hiding its bullying as Israel is in hiding its nuclear arsenal.