God's Kingdom Ministries
Serious Bible Study

GKM

Donate
2024 Tabernacles Conference
October 18-20! Click banner for details

The Book of Revelation - Part 29 The Three Frogs

FFI List

March 2005 - The Book of Revelation - Part 29 The Three Frogs

Issue #198
FFI Header

Issue #198March 2005

The Book of Revelation - Part 29 The Three Frogs

In the last FFI I wrote that Giusseppe Mazzini had written a letter to the Grand Master Albert Pike on January 22, 1870. It has since come to my attention that the letter was actually dated August 15, 1871. (See The Red Fog Over America, Wm. Guy Carr, p. 225.) Carr himself does not reproduce the letter in his book. The last part of the letter is reproduced on page 198 of Architects of Deception, written by Swedish historian, Juri Lina. He informs us of his source on page 197:

“Pike wrote a letter to Guiseppe Mazzini (whose alias was Emunach Memed), dated 15 August 1871 (or as he wrote it 0871). The historian Domenico Margiotta published the letter in his book ‘Le Palladisme: Culte de Satan-Lucifer’ (‘Palladism: Cult of Satan-Lucifer’), Grenoble, 1895, p. 186).”

If Margiotta had perpetrated a huge fraud upon the public by forging such a letter, we would have to consider him to be a modern prophet. To publish such a plan as early as 1895 shows the authenticity of Pike’s letter.

Commander Carr was provided with a later book written by Cardinal Rodriguez of Chile, The Mystery of Freemasonry Revealed,” published in 1925, in which he made reference to Margiotta’s earlier book. Hence, Carr writes in his The Red Fog over America, p. 225,

On page 188 the Cardinal names several authorities who made reference to Pike’s letter and plan in 1895 and 1896.”

It is important to understand the “three unclean spirits like frogs” of Rev. 16:13, and how they work to gather the nations to Armageddon. Such knowledge can help us to avoid being caught up by their unclean philosophy. The prime antidote is to hear the Word of the New Jerusalem.

Mystery Babylon and the Old Jerusalem

One of the most basic goals of freemasonry is to build a new “temple of Solomon.” This is not merely a physical building, but the symbol of “the New World Order.” All of the symbolism in Western Freemasonry is taken from the Cabbala (Jewish mysticism), and the highest degrees actually teach directly from the Cabbala. The idea is to turn people into workers for unknown masters who are, in fact, Luciferian Cabbalists, the outward manifestation of the “dragon” in the book of Revelation.

Needless to say, the lower-level freemasons have no idea what they are supporting or who is the god of their superiors. They are mere “workers” being used as pawns in a much larger plan to usurp power over God’s creation.

The New Jerusalem is said to be the Bride of Christ in Rev. 21:2,

2 And I saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, made ready as a bride adorned for her husband.

The counterpart of the true Bride of Christ is the Great Harlot of Rev. 17:5. Later in verse 18, we read,

18 And the woman whom you saw is the great city which reigns over the kings of the earth.

So the false bride is also a “city.” It is called “Babylon” but it is also associated with the old Jerusalem, which had become babylonianized. Rev. 11:8 identifies Jerusalem also with both Sodom and Egypt, saying,

8 And their dead bodies will lie in the street of the great city which mystically is called Sodom and Egypt, where also their Lord was crucified.

Sodom, Egypt, Jerusalem, and Babylon all symbolically represent the same evil “city” that rivals New Jerusalem. The only difference is that each of the cities represent a different aspect of the false bride. Sodom portrays its moral corruption. Egypt shows its tendency to bring men into bondage. Babylon shows its commercial bondage. Jerusalem shows its violent rejection of Jesus Christ and its desire to usurp His right to rule the earth. Each has its own character, but together they describe Mystery Babylon.

Christians who study the Bible are presented with the contrast between the old and the new Jerusalem. The old Jerusalem is portrayed as “the bloody city,” (Ez. 22:2-4) even though its name was supposed to represent “the City of Peace.” Because the rulers of Jerusalem had shed much blood, including the blood of the prophets and finally of the Messiah Himself, the prophets say that God forsook that city even as He had earlier forsaken Shiloh.

When Israel first went into Canaan under Joshua, the ark was placed at Shiloh, a city in Ephraim (Josh. 18:1). A few centuries later, the priesthood in Shiloh under the leadership of Eli and his sons were so wicked that God removed His presence from that place and ultimately moved it to Jerusalem. The story is told in 1 Sam. 4 and in Psalm 78:60-68.

But Jerusalem also corrupted itself with violence, and so Jeremiah tells us in Jer. 7:11-15,

11 Has this house, which is called by My name, become a den of robbers in your sight? . . . 12 But go now to My place which was in Shiloh, where I made My name dwell at the first, and see what I did to it because of the wickedness of My people Israel. 13 And now, because you have done all these things. . . 14 therefore, I will do to the house which is called by My name, in which you trust, and to the place which I gave you and your fathers, as I did to Shiloh. 15 And I will cast you out of My sight, as I have cast out all your brothers, all the offspring of Ephraim.

Even as the glory of God departed from Shiloh in 1 Sam. 4:22, so also did God forsake the temple in the old Jerusalem. Jeremiah gave the verdict; Ezekiel saw it happen in Ez. 10:18 and 19,

18 Then the glory of the Lord departed from the threshold of the temple and stood over the cherubim. 19 When the cherubim departed, they lifted their wings and rose up from the earth in my sight with the wheels beside them; and they stood still at the entrance of the east gate of the Lord’s house. And the glory of the God of Israel hovered over them.

Finally, Ezekiel 11:23 says,

23 And the glory of the Lord went up from the midst of the city and stood over the mountain which is east of the city.

The glory’s departure occurred in stages. Ezekiel saw the glory depart only as far as the Mount of Olives to the east of Jerusalem. Centuries later, Jesus Christ, who is the Glory of God, ascended from that place (Acts 1:12) to complete the departure.

Ten days later the glory returned on Pentecost to inhabit a new “city” made of living stones, God’s people. Never again would He return to inhabit a carnal temple made with dead stones.

When Christians reject this basic truth, they open themselves up to the words of the “frog” that the new Jerusalem is just the old Jerusalem converted to Christ. This is a great deception. The “frog” then draws Christians to believe that non-Christian Jews are privileged to rule the earth whether or not they accept Jesus as the Christ. Thus, Christian eschatology ends up with a bloody city ruled by carnal people who are absolved of murdering the prophets and the Son Himself.

Next, Jesus’ words are undermined. They say that the Gospels were written much later by disciples who either misquoted Jesus or who were motivated by “hatred.” The bottom line is that we are expected to reject the inspiration of the New Testament in order not to offend God’s privileged people.

Yet Jesus Himself pronounced the same sentence upon Jerusalem and its temple that Jeremiah did. Both said it was a den of robbers (Jer. 7:11; Matt. 21:13). Jesus made it clear in His parable of Matt. 21:30-44 that the rulers of the people killed the prophets and the Son, the Heir, not out of ignorance, but because they coveted the Kingdom for themselves. The final verdict is given in verse 43,

43 Therefore I say to you, the kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a nation producing the fruit of it.

Modern evangelical Christianity is becoming more and more Judaized. Christians are looking toward their so-called “Jewish roots” and rejecting the Root and Offspring of David (Rev. 22:16). They are agreeing with Jesus’ adversaries even as Judas betrayed Him. In the name of Bible prophecy, they are assisting the Zionists in their theft of Palestinian land. They rejoice when Palestinians are murdered, even when those Palestinians are Christians!

All of this is the deceptive philosophy of the frog that comes from the mouth of the beast, sent upon Christians to deceive them into supporting the war of Armageddon. I have heard such Christians rejoice when Palestinians are killed. Recently, an American general said it was “fun” killing certain Iraqi people. This is not Christianity; this is madness, religious insanity.

In fact, it is not even true Judaism. It is political Zionism, based upon self-interest, covetousness, and idolatry. Judaism opposed Zionism for many years, but Hitler gave Zionism its status as spokesman for the Jews in 1933. Hitler and the Zionists both had a common interest in getting German Jews to move to Palestine. German Jews did not want to leave, so they were forced to leave, and anyone who refused to do so found himself in grave danger.

According to The Transfer Agreement, by Jewish author, Edwin Black, p. 166-168,

“Historically, Zionism had always been a German Jewish taboo. Yet in 1933 the leaders of this shunned splinter were suddenly elevated to the status of spokesmen and agents of German Jewry—a people they did not represent. A broken-line triangle between German Jews, Zionism, and Nazism was the key to Zionism’s sudden ascent as Jewish custodian for the Third Reich.”

“Clinging to their communal existence, and unwilling to return to the Promised Land until beckoned by the Messiah, religious German Jews saw Zionism as sacrilege.

“So in 1897, when Herzl selected Munich as the site of the First Zionist Congress, Jewish leaders throughout Germany publicly protested until the convention was relocated to Basel. Anti-Zionism was one of the few Jewish topics Reform, Orthodox, cosmopolitan, and ghetto Jews could agree on.”

The average Jew did not know that Albert Pike’s 1871 plan for Armageddon mandated the formation of a Jewish State and that the second world war was designed to accomplish this. The average Zionist does not know that he has been brought to this Jewish State to be cannon fodder in the time of Armageddon.

Strangely enough, most Christians do know this, for it is often preached that in this final war only 144,000 Jews will survive WORLD-WIDE. Seeing as how millions of Jews remain in other parts of the world, it is hard to see how they can account for any survivors at all in the Jewish State. And yet they gleefully give donations to buy Jewish families a one-way ticket to their destruction.

It is the unclean spirit of the frog. There is no other explanation for such insanity.

The Frog of the False Prophet

Albert Pike wrote in 1871,

The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the ‘agentur’ of the ‘Illuminati’ between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other.”

Most of the Islamic world has easily fallen into the Masonic trap to destroy all religions including Islam, because they are unaware of the things I have written in my book, The Struggle for the Birthright.

Osama bin Laden is the primary tool being used to rally the Islamic world to the battle of Armageddon. As Pike predicted, the injustice of the Jewish State could easily be used to motivate the Islamic world into a war of revenge. As bin Laden said in his “letter to America” dated Nov. 24, 2002,

“You attacked us in Palestine, which has sunk under military occupation for more than eighty years. The British handed over Palestine with your help and your support to the Jews, who have occupied it for more than fifty years; years overflowing with oppression, tyranny, crimes, killings, expulsions, destruction and devastation. The creation and continuation of Israel is one of the greatest crimes, and you are the leader of its criminals. . . The creation of Israel is a crime that must be erased. . .

“It is commanded by our religion and intellect that the oppressed have a right to return the aggression. Do not await anything from us except jihad, resistance, and revenge.”

Osama bin Laden worked for the CIA during the time that Russia was occupying Afghanistan. His CIA agent name (that is, his alias) was Tim Osman. I do not know if he is still working for the CIA under deep cover or not, but he is certainly working to implement Albert Pike’s plan of 1871—whether he knows it or not.

He lost his Saudi citizenship in 1994, and his assets were frozen. So in 1996 when expelled from Sudan, he flew to Afghanistan once again and began to make money on the drug trade. According to Osama’s Revenge, by Paul Williams, p. 33,

“The laboratories soon became capable of producing five thousand metric tons of heroin a year, making bin Laden the world’s largest supplier of the new international drug of choice.”

Packets of “binnys” were sold in America for $20 a bag in New York City. With an income from $500 million to a billion dollars a year, he began to purchase nuclear suitcase bombs from the former Soviet Union that were being stolen and sold on the black market in the 1990’s.

“In an interview with Hamid Mir in November 2001, bin Laden was even more explicit. ‘We have chemical and nuclear weapons,’ he told the Pakistani editor. ‘If America uses chemical or nuclear weapons against us, then we may retort with chemical or nuclear weapons’.”

Osama bin Laden believes that destruction is necessary in order to reconstruct the world upon his Islamic model. Pike would have been delighted. Williams says, page 53,

“Not since the demise of the Ottoman Empire at the close of World War I had there been an attempt to create a union of the ummas (‘true believers’) throughout the Middle East and central Asia under the green flag of Islam. The union would be established by war and the khalifa would rise like a phoenix from the ashes of the United States of America and Judeo-Christian civilization.”

But what makes Osama bin Laden the main mouthpiece of the frog coming out of the mouth of the false prophet? It is the fact that he is being proclaimed as the end-time Mahdi who is supposed to lead the Muslims to the final victory in the “Day of Islam.” Williams writes on pages 174-175 of Osama’s Revenge,

“His attendants bow before him and greet him as ‘awaited enlightened one.’ This title has been bestowed upon him by believers throughout the Muslim world—both Sunnis and Shiites. He is more than a mighty warrior or a religious leader. To his followers, he is the rightly guided caliph—the Mahdi—who will appear during the last days of human history. . .

“His coming has been foretold by the Haddith, the collection of sacred teachings that supplement the Koran. In such writings, he is depicted as the prophet who will appear at a time when Muslims are oppressed throughout the world. He will unite the believers to fight off the vast army of their oppressors—the army of Yajuj wa-Majuj (‘the infidel unbelievers’), led by the Dabbah, or ‘the Beast.’ He will lead the Muslims to victory and bring forth the Day of Islam, when all people throughout the world—believers and nonbelievers alike—will fall in total submission to the will of Allah.

“After restoring justice to the world by imposing shariah on all nations, he will lead the people in prayer at Mecca—an occasion at which Jesus will be present. Following the ceremony, he will rule over the Muslim people for seven years.

“The writings foretell that the long-awaited one will be a descendant of Mohammed through his daughter Fatima. He will have the same name as the Prophet, and his father will have the same name as the Prophet’s father. He will have a distinctive forehead, a prominent nose, and a black mole on his face. He will be known for his generosity and altruism. He will arise from Arabia and will be called from a cave by Allah to serve as the savior of all true believers…

“In his edicts and official correspondence, he no longer signs his name as Osama bin Laden but as Osama bin Muhammad bin Laden.

“He is the ‘awaited enlightened one.’

“He is the mighty warrior of the Apocalypse.

“He is the realization of nearly fourteen hundred years of Islamic history.

“He is the Mahdi.”

He is what Rev. 16:13 calls, “the false prophet.” He is leading the Islamic people into Armageddon. He deceives the Islamic people by proposing that the Kingdom of Allah will be established by violence and revenge. His “frog” speaks with the same voice as the “frog” of the Christians and the Jews.

All of these religions are based upon the principle of the bloody city, the old Jerusalem. They all give lip service to the idea of God being a God of love and peace, but they teach that His Peaceable Kingdom can come only by men of violence.

When King Herod imprisoned John the Baptist, Jesus said of this in Matt. 11:13,

13 And from the days of John the Baptist until now the kingdom of heaven suffers violence, and violent men take it by force.

Jesus was not advocating violence; He was criticizing the violent men who thought that God needed the arm of flesh to establish His kingdom.

Ultimately, the problem is rooted in men’s hypocritical unbelief. They say that God is sovereign, but in practice, they believe God cannot work His will in the earth without the help of man—usually by violence and force.

So Christians believe in the “Day of the Lord” and Muslims believe in their “Day of Islam,” and many on each side work toward this destruction as their goal. It may be inevitable, but we do not have to assist in the plan.

As we have shown in other writings, the spirit of the old Jerusalem is full of bloodshed. Judaism, Christianity, and Islam all want the physical city of Jerusalem, believing that God values real estate above the lives of men. The idolatry of “holy places” prevents men from seeing the truth of the New Jerusalem, which is the true City of Peace that alone is the Capital of the Kingdom of God. This New Jerusalem is constructed of people, not stones, children, not mere servants.

All are vulnerable to Albert Pike’s plan of destruction through their faith in the old Jerusalem and its system of violence that is said to be necessary to bring peace.