Latest Posts
View the latest posts in an easy-to-read list format, with filtering options.
The epistle known as Second Epistle of Peter presents itself as the final written testimony of the apostle Simon Peter. It is one of the most debated books in the New Testament regarding authorship, date, and historical setting, yet it was ultimately received into the canon by the early church.
Unlike 1 Peter, 2 Peter was accepted more slowly in the early church. Some early Christians questioned it because its Greek style differs greatly from 1 Peter, it was not widely circulated at first, and it closely parallels Epistle of Jude.
Yet we know that Peter was not trained as a writer or scribe. He was a fisherman, and his training as a disciple of Christ would not have included any courses in refined writing. There is no doubt that he received help in writing both of his epistles. It is almost certain, then, that Peter got help from two different scribes, who could polish Peter’s dictation and which would account for the different writing styles.
As for the letter being less circulated, we must keep in mind that Peter’s letters were written to small home churches farther to the north near the Black Sea. We would not expect them to be circulated widely among the churches that received Paul’s letters.
Several major church fathers eventually accepted it as genuine. Origen (3rd century) acknowledged disputes about the letter but still used it as Scripture. Bishop Eusebius (4th century) listed it among the “disputed” books yet recognized that many churches accepted it. Jerome (5th century) defended Peter’s authorship despite stylistic differences. Athanasius included it in his canonical list in 367 A.D. By the late fourth century, the church broadly recognized 2 Peter as canonical.
A historically important statement appears in 2 Peter 3:15, 16, where Peter refers to the writings of Paul the Apostle and places them alongside “the rest of the Scriptures.” This is one of the earliest indications that apostolic writings were already being viewed as sacred Scripture.
We are no longer dependent upon scholarly opinion as to which books and letters should be included in Scripture. Both Hebrew and Greek used their alphabets as their numbering system as well. Hence, every letter of every word is also a number. Hence, the entire Bible can be expressed as a series of numbers, with each word having a total numeric value, such as Jesus, whose Greek letters add up to 888. This allowed Ivan Panin to discover astonishing mathematical patterns built into the text of each book of the Bible.
Ivan Panin (1855–1942) was a Russian-born scholar, linguist, and mathematician best known for his work on what he called “Bible numerics”—the study of numerical patterns in the Hebrew and Greek texts of Scripture. He became one of the most famous advocates of the idea that mathematical structures embedded in the Bible demonstrate divine inspiration.
Panin’s conversion occurred around 1890 while studying the Greek text of the Gospel of John. He became intrigued by grammatical and numerical patterns in the text, especially in John 1:1, and concluded that the Bible contained an intricate mathematical structure impossible to produce by accident.
This led him to devote the remainder of his life to analyzing numerical features of Scripture. Panin spent over 50 years compiling numerical analyses of the biblical text, reportedly producing more than 40,000 handwritten pages of research. Panin eventually settled in Canada, where he continued his research until his death in 1942. His later years were devoted almost entirely to biblical numerical analysis and publication.
Panin believed numerical structures could help determine the authentic biblical text and expose scribal alterations. For example, he argued that disputed passages could be tested by whether they preserved the numerical patterns he identified. Although mainstream biblical scholarship has generally not accepted his conclusions, he conclusively proved (in my view) that the Scriptures contained mathematical patterns of gematria which would have been impossible for any man to construct purposely. To me, those patterns prove Holy Spirit inspiration that is not seen in any other book on earth.
Panin’s Numeric English New Testament can be obtained from various sources, including:
Panin accepted 2 Peter as genuine Scripture and believed its Greek text exhibited the same numerical structures he found elsewhere in the New Testament.